Em 18-08-2011 15:11, Chris Rankin escreveu: > Two more patches: > > a) clean up resources more reliably if em28xx_init_dev() fails, > b) move two printk() statements outside the mutex lock > > Cheers, > Chris > > Signed-off-by: Chris Rankin <rankincj@xxxxxxxxx> > Chris, Please, never send two patches at the same email. This doesn't work: patchwork and all tools used by me and other maintainers will either discard one or both patches, or even merge both into one. Also, when you're sending us a series of patches, be sure to number the patch series with PATCH 01/xx (where xx is the last patch), and put a different subject on each patch. There's no need to reply the original thread. See how all your patches will appear for me: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?submitter=4542 It is very hard to know that you have a complese series of patches, instead of just a new version of a patch that you've already sent. By default, the last case is assumed, as it is somewhat common to reply to a patch with a new version of it (yet, the best practice would be to rename the new patch series as PATCH v2, PATCH v3, etc). If I wouldn't notice this before I would simply mark all patches except by the last one as superseded, and just get the last one. Thanks! Mauro PS.: I suggest you to take a look at the wiki page bellow. It helps people about what's the expected way for you to submit your work http://linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Development:_How_to_submit_patches -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
