Hi Sven, On Monday 01 August 2011 12:07:15 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Sunday 31 July 2011 17:00:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 July 2011 11:47:44 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through > > > <linux/atomic.h> to provide the functionality of > > > atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I'll queue this to my tree for v3.2. Please let me know if you would > > rather push the patch through another tree. > > The problem is that until now no one from linux-arch has applied the patch > 01/11 in his tree (which is needed before this patch can be applied) and > you tree have to be based on the "yet to be chosen linux-arch tree". > Otherwise your tree will just break and not be acceptable for a pull > request. > > Maybe it is easier when one person applies 01-11 after 02-11 was Acked-by > the responsible maintainers. > > 02 is more or less automatically Acked-by us :) > 04, 09 and 10 are also Acked. > ... and the rest is waiting for actions. OK. I'm fine with 05/11 being pushed through any tree with my ack. Please let me know if/when you want me to apply it to my tree. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
