On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > they typically don't fall into the highmem zone. As the dmabounce > > > code allocates from the DMA coherent allocator to provide it with > > > guaranteed DMA-able memory, that would be rather inconvenient. > > > > True. The dmabounce code would consequently have to allocate > > the memory through an internal function that avoids the > > contiguous allocation area and goes straight to ZONE_DMA memory > > as it does today. > > CMA's whole purpose for existing is to provide _dma-able_ contiguous > memory for things like cameras and such like found on crippled non- > scatter-gather hardware. If that memory is not DMA-able what's the > point? ZONE_DMA is a zone for memory of legacy (crippled) devices that cannot DMA into all of memory (and so is ZONE_DMA32). Memory from ZONE_NORMAL can be used for DMA as well and a fully capable device would be expected to handle any memory in the system for DMA transfers. "guaranteed" dmaable memory? DMA abilities are device specific. Well maybe you can call ZONE_DMA memory to be guaranteed if you guarantee that any device must at mininum be able to perform DMA into ZONE_DMA memory. But there may not be much of that memory around so you would want to limit the use of that scarce resource. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
