Em 24-06-2011 09:20, Devin Heitmueller escreveu: >> Applications are certainly using it. I know this for a fact for the ivtv driver where >> feature improvements are marked that way. >> >> Without more research on how this is used I am not comfortable with this. >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans > > MythTV has a bunch of these too (mainly so the code can adapt to > driver bugs that are fixed in later revisions). Putting Mauro's patch > upstream will definitely cause breakage. It shouldn't, as ivtv driver version is lower than 3.0.0. All the old bug fixes aren't needed if version is >= 3.0.0. Besides that, trusting on a driver revision number to detect that a bug is there is not the right thing to do, as version numbers are never increased at the stable kernels (nor distro modified kernels take care of increasing revision number as patches are backported there). In other words, relying on it doesn't work fine. > Also, it screws up the ability for users to get fixes through the > media_build tree (unless you are increasing the revision constantly > with every merge you do). Why? Developers don't increase version numbers on every applied patch (with is great, as it avoids merge conflicts). Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
