On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM, HoP <jpetrous@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > get inspired by (unfortunately close-source) solution on stb > Dreambox 800 I have made my own implementation > of virtual DVB device, based on the same device API. > > In conjunction with "Dreamtuner" userland project > [http://code.google.com/p/dreamtuner/] by Ronald Mieslinger > user can create virtual DVB device on client side and connect it > to the server. When connected, user is able to use any Linux DVB API > compatible application on client side (like VDR, MeTV, MythTV, etc) > without any need of code modification. As server can be used any > Linux DVB API compatible device. I can think of many interesting uses for a solution like this. It's great that such a driver exists and that people can use it now to create interesting do-it-yourself projects, however, I do not believe this should ever be merged into the kernel. If this solution were merged into the kernel, there would be no reason for companies like Hauppauge to ever again contribute any open source drivers. Once it's possible to deliver a closed source driver to the masses, that's what vendors will do -- there will no longer be any motivation to continue working in open source. Some may like that idea, but I feel this will destroy the foundation that we've been building for years. I repeat, the solution itself has some potential, and I see nothing wrong with this existing and being available to users in source code form, but it should never be merged into a kernel to be shipped directly to end-users. This can create a horrible president that would truly result in the prevention of open source driver contributions from silicon vendors and hardware manufacturers. Regards, Michael Krufky LinuxTV developer / Hauppauge Digital -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
