2011/5/31 Dmitri Belimov <d.belimov@xxxxxxxxx>: > Is it possible make some patches and add support xc4000 into kernel? > > With my best regards, Dmitry. What needs to happen here is somebody needs to prepare a patch series which contains all the relevant patches, including the SOBs. This is entirely an janitorial task which can be done by anyone and frankly I don't have time for this sort of crap anymore. Any volunteers? All my patches have my SOB attached. I explicitly got Davide's permission to add his SOB to his original patch, but it's not in the HG tree since I got the permission after I committed his change to my repo. I can forward the email with his SOB so the person constructing the tree can add it on (as well as my SOB to preserve the chain of custody). Secondly, we need to build a firmware image which is based off of the *actual* xceive firmware sources, so that we can be confident that all the blobs are from the same firmware revision and so that we can maintain them going forward. I can provide them off-list to someone willing to do this work and testing. Istann_v's firmware image is based off of i2c dumps and extracted by hand from disassembled firmware, which is less than ideal from an ongoing maintenance perspective. And of course it's worth mentioning that the driver itself still needs a ton of cleanup, doesn't meet the coding standards, and wouldn't be accepted upstream in its current state. Somebody will need to do the work to clean up the driver, as well as testing to make sure he/she didn't cause any regressions. In summary, here are the four things that need to happen: 1. Assemble tree with current patches 2. Construct valid firmware image off of current sources 3. Cleanup/coding style 4. Testing Now that we've got a bunch of people who are interested in seeing this upstream, who is going to volunteer to do which items in the above list? Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs http://www.kernellabs.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
