On Monday 23 May 2011 16:37:18 Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 05/23/2011 03:58 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > From be7d0f72ebf4d945cfb2a5c9cc871707f72e1e3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@xxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:56:31 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] FE_GET_PROPERTY should be _IOW, because the associated > > structure is transferred from userspace to kernelspace. Keep the old > > ioctl around for compatibility so that existing code is not broken. > Hi, > Good catch, but I think _IOWR would be right, because the result gets > copied from kernelspace to userspace. Those flags are only for the IOCTL associated structure itself. The V4L DVB kernel only reads the dtv_properties structure in either case and does not write any data back to it. That's why only _IOW is required. I checked somewhat and the R/W bits in the IOCTL command does not appear do be matched to the R/W permissions you have on the file handle? Or am I mistaken? In other words the IOCTL R/W (_IOC_READ, _IOC_WRITE) bits should not reflect what the IOCTL actually does, like modifying indirect data? > > It would be nice if you could send future patches inline rather than > attached. I'd suggest using git format-patch and git send-email. I will try to have a look at that. I'm waiting for the 16 patches I've submitted today to get reviewed and committed, before I start the next batch. Thank you! --HPS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
