Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:27:46PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> Mark Brown wrote: > >>> I'm not sure what "supply_nasty" would mean? This also doesn't seem >>> like something that we can set up per supply - it's going to affect the >>> whole regulator state, it's not something that only affects a single >>> supply. > >> supply_nasty() would be used to define a regulator which is enabled by >> the boot loader when it shouldn't be, which is the actual problem. > > That's *really* not a clear name. I agree. It was just meant to imply that there's something wrong in the way it behaves. :-) >> How should this regulator be turned off in the boot by the kernel? > > Have you read my previous mail where I described the existing support > for doing this when we have a full set of information on the regualtors > in the systems? Yes, I did read it but I first understood that this use case wasn't supported right now. Having read it again, that's clearly the way to go with fixing this. Thanks. Regards, -- Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
