On 8 April 2011 17:07, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Javier, > > On Friday 08 April 2011 17:02:48 javier Martin wrote: >> Hi, >> I've just received a LI-LBCM3M1 camera module from Leopard Imaging and >> I want to test it with my Beagleboard xM. This module has a mt9t111 >> sensor. >> >> At first glance, this driver >> (http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.38/drivers/media/video/mt9t112.c) >> supports mt9t111 sensor and uses both soc-camera and v4l2-subdev >> frameworks. >> I am trying to somehow connect this sensor with the omap3isp driver >> recently merged (I'm working with latest mainline kernel), however, I >> found an issue when trying to pass "mt9t112_camera_info" data to the >> sensor driver in my board specific file. >> >> It seems that this data is passed through soc-camera but omap3isp >> doesn't use soc-camera. Do you know what kind of changes are required >> to adapt this driver so that it can be used with omap3isp? > > The OMAP3 ISP driver isn't compatible with the soc-camera framework, as you > correctly noticed. You will need to port the MT9T111 driver to pad-level > subdev operations. > > You can find a sensor driver (MT9V032) implementing pad-level subdev > operations at > http://git.linuxtv.org/pinchartl/media.git?a=commit;h=940b87a5cb7ea3f3cff16454e9085e33ab340064 > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart > Hi Laurent, thank you for your quick answer. Does the fact of adding pad-level subdev operations for the sensor break old way of doing things? I mean, if I port MT9T111 driver to pad-level subdev operations would it be accepted for mainline or would it be rejected since it breaks something older? Thank you, -- Javier Martin Vista Silicon S.L. CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345 Avda de los Castros s/n 39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain +34 942 25 32 60 www.vista-silicon.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
