Issa Gorissen wrote:
On 13/03/11 11:47, Martin Vidovic wrote:
Btw, we should choose a more meaningful name for 'camX'.
I would prefer something like cainoutX or caioX or cinoutX or cioX.
I agree, camX could be misleading since it's not necessarily a CAM
application.
According to EN 50221 the two interfaces are named Command Interface
(for caX)
and Transport Stream Interface (for camX). Then maybe 'tsiX' would be
an appropriate
name?
Anyway, 'cioX' sounds good too.
I'll prepare the patch with caio (for conditional access I/O) if all
agrees on it. tsi is a good candidate as it perfectly matches the
standard specification, but then, ca should have been ci...
--
Issa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Fine with me, as long as the name is stable.
However, these issues still bother me:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg29022.html
Regards,
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
