On 03/12/2011 03:57 PM, Martin Vidovic wrote: > Andreas Oberritter wrote: >> On 03/12/2011 03:10 PM, Issa Gorissen wrote: >> >>> From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>>> On 03/11/2011 10:44 PM, Martin Vidovic wrote: >>>> >>>>> Andreas Oberritter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's rather unintuitive that some CAMs appear as ca0, while others as >>>>>> cam0. >>>>>> >>>>> Ngene CI appears as both ca0 and cam0 (or sec0). The ca0 node is used >>>>> as usual, to setup the CAM. The cam0 (or sec0) node is used to >>>>> read/write >>>>> transport stream. To me it looks like an extension of the current >>>>> API. >>>>> >>>> I see. This raises another problem. How to find out, which ca device >>>> cam0 relates to, in case there are more ca devices than cam devices? >>>> >>>> >>> Are you sure there can be more ca devices than cam devices ? >>> >> >> Yes. See my previous response to Ralph. >> > > Isn't this the same as asking which 'dvr' device relates to which > 'frontend' device? No, because this is defined. If demuxN is configured to output to a dvr device, then it outputs to dvrN. The input of demuxN is configured by using DMX_SET_SOURCE, which can be frontendX or dvrY. Regards, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
