On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:08:07PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > > What we could also do, we could add an optional callback to subdev (core?) > > > operations, which, if activated, the host would call on each frame > > > completion. > > > > It's not quite that simple. The exposure of the next frame has started long > > time before that. This requires much more thought probably --- in the case > > of lack of hardware support, when the parameters need to be actually given > > to the sensor depend somewhat on sensors, I suppose. > > Yes, that's right. I seem to remember, there was a case, for which such a > callback would have been useful... Don't remember what that was though. I remember now:) I meant to use it to trigger the next frame from the software per sensor I2C command, if no hardware trigger is available. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
