On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Andrew Chew wrote: > Reposting. Sorry for the rich text in my previous email. > > I'm looking at the videobuf2 stuff, and would like to use it because it > solves a bunch of problems for me that were in videobuf (for example, > I'm writing a variant of videobuf-dma-contig, and there's some private > memory allocator state I needed to track, but the videobuf stuff didn't > seem to let you do that). > > But I'm also using soc_camera. I was wondering if there's a time > estimate for soc_camera to be converted over to the videobuf2 framework. > > Also, are SoC camera host drivers expected to call the methods in the > videobuf2 ops table directly (as in, vb2_ops->alloc())? Or will there > be wrappers around these in the future (the wrappers can take the > videobuf2's alloc_ctx as a parameter and thereby figure out which method > to call). Please, have a look at this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/28782 I plan to push soc-camera videobuf2 support for 2.6.39. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
