Hi Hans,
On Friday 04 February 2011 14:19:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, February 04, 2011 13:34:02 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > And many thanks for the comments!
> >
> > Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > >> diff --git a/include/media/media-entity.h
> > >> b/include/media/media-entity.h index b82f824..114541a 100644
> > >> --- a/include/media/media-entity.h
> > >> +++ b/include/media/media-entity.h
> > >> @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ struct media_entity {
> > >>
> > >> struct media_pad *pads; /* Pads array (num_pads elements) */
> > >> struct media_link *links; /* Links array (max_links elements)*/
> > >>
> > >> + int use_count; /* Use count for the entity. */
> > >
> > > Isn't unsigned better?
> >
> > Could be. The result, though, will be slightly more difficult checking
> > for bad use count --- which always is a driver bug.
> >
> > me->use_count += change;
> > WARN_ON(me->use_count < 0);
> >
> > we must do something like this:
> >
> > if (change < 0)
> >
> > WARN_ON(me->use_count < (unsigned)-change);
> >
> > me->use_count += change;
> >
> > I'd perhaps also go with unsigned int; the choice for signed was made
> > mainly since the above check and with signed int the check was more
> > trivial.
>
> I saw this WARN_ON as well. I think there is a good reason for that
> WARN_ON, but I think a comment in the header explaining why it is an int
> will be useful. If I trip over it, then others will as well :-)
I'll add a comment. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
