On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:35:44 +0100 (CET) Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:09:15 +0100 (CET) > > Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > > I can't try mplayer since I don't have mplayer setup for this. > > > > But looking at the mplayer source I don't see why it should > > > > behave differently. Depending on mode mplayer queues 2 or 6 > > > > buffers. Testing with my test app with 6 queued buffers shows > > > > no issues, here the buffer numbers toggle correctly, too. > > > > > > Ok, I've done a couple more tests. With larger frames, and, therefore > > > lower fps - yes, with your patch buffers toggle correctly. Whereas in my > > > tests with smaller frames and higher fps either only one buffer is used, > > > or one is used much more often, than the other, e.g., 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0... > > > Could you try to verify? Without your patch with any fps buffers toggle > > > consistently. > > > > How small are the frames in you test? What is the highest fps value in > > your test? > > QVGA, don't know fps exactly, pretty high, between 20 and 60fps, I think. > Just try different frams sizes, go down to 64x48 or something. Testing of 960x243 frames at 30 fps has been done during all my previous tests. I didn't see any issues at 30 fps. Anatolij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
