On Sunday, January 02, 2011 11:41:31 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 01-01-2011 17:53, Hans Verkuil escreveu: > > The subject says it all: > > > > If there are no objections, then I propose that the deprecated et61x251 and > > sn9c102 are moved to staging for 2.6.38 and marked for removal in 2.6.39. > > Nack. > > There are several USB ID's on sn9c102 not covered by gspca driver yet. Why are these drivers marked deprecated then? > It seems to me that et61x251 will also stay there for a long time, as there are > just two devices supported by gspca driver, while et61x251 supports 25. > > Btw, we currently have a conflict with this USB ID: > USB_DEVICE(0x102c, 0x6151), > > Both etoms and et61x251 support it, and there's no #if to disable it on one > driver, if both drivers are compiled. We need to disable it either at gspca_etoms > or at et61x251, in order to avoid users of having a random experience with this > device. Surely such devices should be removed from et61x251 or sn9c102 as soon as they are added to gspca? Regards, Hans > > > > If there are no objections, then I'll make a patch for this. > > > > Regards, > > > > Hans > > > Cheers, > Mauro > -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
