On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 08:32:24PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 15:36, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:39:46PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > > > uvc_gpio_parse() can return -EPROBE_DEFER when the GPIOs it depends on > > > have not yet been probed. This return code should be propagated to the > > > caller of uvc_probe() to ensure that probing is retried when the required > > > GPIOs become available. > > > > > > Currently, this error code is incorrectly converted to -ENODEV, > > > causing some internal cameras to be ignored. > > > > > > This commit fixes this issue by propagating the -EPROBE_DEFER error. > > > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Fixes: 2886477ff987 ("media: uvcvideo: Implement UVC_EXT_GPIO_UNIT") > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 9 ++++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > > > index a10d4f4d9f95..73a7f23b616c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > > > @@ -2253,9 +2253,10 @@ static int uvc_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > > > } > > > > > > /* Parse the associated GPIOs. */ > > > - if (uvc_gpio_parse(dev) < 0) { > > > + ret = uvc_gpio_parse(dev); > > > + if (ret < 0) { > > > uvc_dbg(dev, PROBE, "Unable to parse UVC GPIOs\n"); > > > - goto error; > > > + goto error_retcode; > > > } > > > > > > dev_info(&dev->udev->dev, "Found UVC %u.%02x device %s (%04x:%04x)\n", > > > @@ -2328,9 +2329,11 @@ static int uvc_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > > > return 0; > > > > > > error: > > > + ret = -ENODEV; > > > +error_retcode: > > > > This isn't very nice. Could we instead also propagate error codes from > > other locations in the uvc_probe() function ? If you want to minimize > > changes, you can initialize ret to -ENODEV, and turn the (ret < 0) check > > for uvc_gpio_parse() to a (ret) check. > > Not very nice, but easy to backport to stables. What about a follow-up > change like this: How about the nicer fix for mainline, and a simpler to backport one for stable ? The main focus should be on mainline, not backports. > index c93abe2367aa..8c67feca1688 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > @@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ static int uvc_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > ret = uvc_gpio_parse(dev); > if (ret < 0) { > uvc_dbg(dev, PROBE, "Unable to parse UVC GPIOs\n"); > - goto error_retcode; > + goto error; > } > > dev_info(&dev->udev->dev, "Found UVC %u.%02x device %s (%04x:%04x)\n", > @@ -2285,24 +2285,32 @@ static int uvc_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > } > > /* Register the V4L2 device. */ > - if (v4l2_device_register(&intf->dev, &dev->vdev) < 0) > + ret = v4l2_device_register(&intf->dev, &dev->vdev); > + if (ret < 0) > goto error; > > /* Scan the device for video chains. */ > - if (uvc_scan_device(dev) < 0) > + if (uvc_scan_device(dev) < 0) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > goto error; > + } > > /* Initialize controls. */ > - if (uvc_ctrl_init_device(dev) < 0) > + if (uvc_ctrl_init_device(dev) < 0) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > goto error; > + } > > /* Register video device nodes. */ > - if (uvc_register_chains(dev) < 0) > + if (uvc_register_chains(dev) < 0) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > goto error; > + } > > #ifdef CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER > /* Register the media device node */ > - if (media_device_register(&dev->mdev) < 0) > + ret = media_device_register(&dev->mdev); > + if (ret < 0) > goto error; > #endif > /* Save our data pointer in the interface data. */ > @@ -2334,8 +2342,6 @@ static int uvc_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > return 0; > > error: > - ret = -ENODEV; > -error_retcode: > uvc_unregister_video(dev); > kref_put(&dev->ref, uvc_delete); > return ret; > > > > uvc_unregister_video(dev); > > > kref_put(&dev->ref, uvc_delete); > > > - return -ENODEV; > > > + return ret; > > > } > > > > > > static void uvc_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf) > > > > > > --- > > > base-commit: c4b7779abc6633677e6edb79e2809f4f61fde157 > > > change-id: 20250129-uvc-eprobedefer-b5ebb4db63cc > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Laurent Pinchart > > Let me know what do you think so I can send a v2 with the change > proposed by Doug. > > Regards! -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart