On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 12:32:30 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 01/03/2025 à 12:09, Vitaliy Shevtsov a écrit :
> > [Why]
> > The timer function code may have an integer wraparound issue. Since both
> > pin->tx_custom_low_usecs and pin->tx_custom_high_usecs can be set to up to
> > 9999999 from the user space via cec_pin_error_inj_parse_line(), this may
> > cause usecs to be overflowed when adap->monitor_pin_cnt is zero and usecs
> > is multiplied by 1000.
> >
> > [How]
> > Fix this by casting usecs to u64 when it is being converted from
> > microseconds to nanoseconds.
> >
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.
> >
> > Fixes: 865463fc03ed ("media: cec-pin: add error injection support")
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c
> > index a70451d99ebc..f15ed5c67a65 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-pin.c
> > @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart cec_pin_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> > pin->wait_usecs = 0;
> > pin->timer_ts = ktime_add_us(ts, usecs);
> > hrtimer_forward_now(timer,
> > - ns_to_ktime(usecs * 1000));
> > + ns_to_ktime((u64)usecs * 1000));
>
> Or maybe us_to_ktime() to be less verbose?
>
> CJ
>
That makes sense but let me check first. I will send a new one soon.
> > return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> > }
> > pin->wait_usecs = usecs - 100;
>
--
Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
