Hi Sebastian, Arnd, While cleaning up patchwork I stumbled on this PR. The odd thing is that the second patch (noinline) is committed, but not the first (avoid warning). Is it still needed? I'm not sure what happened here. The patch is still marked as 'New' in patchwork: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20241018152127.3958436-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx/ The already committed patch was also still marked as 'New', I've changed the state to 'Accepted'. Regards, Hans On 13/12/2024 16:14, Sebastian Fricke wrote: > Hey Mauro & Hans, > > this is my first time doing a pull request for the fixes branch, so > sorry in advance if I did something incorrectly. These are two small > fixes, which I would like to see landing in 6.13 if that is still > possible. > > --- > > The following changes since commit 2dd59fe0e19e1ab955259978082b62e5751924c7: > > media: dvb-frontends: dib3000mb: fix uninit-value in dib3000_write_reg (2024-12-11 17:54:19 +0100) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://gitlab.collabora.com/sebastianfricke/linux.git tags/for-6.13-vcodec-fixes > > for you to fetch changes up to 531a8089b1f45cccd6e9a959bfbd20ecccdb56d4: > > media: mediatek: vcodec: mark vdec_vp9_slice_map_counts_eob_coef noinline (2024-12-13 16:10:18 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Two small fixes for VCodec > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Arnd Bergmann (2): > media: mtk-vcodec: venc: avoid -Wenum-compare-conditional warning > media: mediatek: vcodec: mark vdec_vp9_slice_map_counts_eob_coef noinline > > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/vdec/vdec_vp9_req_lat_if.c | 3 ++- > drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/encoder/venc/venc_h264_if.c | 6 +++++- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Regards, > Sebastian >
