On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 at 00:06, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 02:41:08PM -0800, Patchwork Integration wrote: > > Dear Laurent Pinchart: > > > > Thanks for your patches! > > > > The CI had a great time going through them, and it could not find > > any issue. > > > > For more details, check the full report at: > > https://linux-media.pages.freedesktop.org/-/users/patchwork/-/jobs/68621153/artifacts/report.htm . > > I don't know if it's worth it, but I wonder if we could save some CPU > cycles and skip CI when the cover letter mentions a link to a successful > CI pipeline run. Clearly not high on the wish list, just something to > keep in mind. The user might have a different CI configuration than the one used by media-committers. So it is probably a good idea to not skip the build. Also, in the future I expect that most of the Pull Request will be replaced with MR in media-committers. Regards! > > > Best regards, and Happy Hacking! > > Media CI robot on behalf of the linux-media community. > > > > --- > > Check the latest rules for contributing your patches at: > > https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.html > > > > If you believe that the CI is wrong, kindly open an issue at > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/media-ci/-/issues or reply-all > > to this message. > > > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart -- Ricardo Ribalda
