On 17/12/2024 16:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 17/12/2024 17:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 17/12/2024 14:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 17/12/2024 15:06, Vikram Sharma wrote:
This patch change clock names to make it consistent with
existing platforms as gcc_cam_hf_axi -> gcc_axi_hf.
This also adds gcc_axi_sf and remove gcc_camera_ahb.
Don't combine ABI changes with some less important things.
You miss here explanation why doing the ABI change in the first place.
Without that explanation I find it rather churn. But anyway, reason for
ABI break and impact should be documented in commit msg.
Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Best regards,
Krzysztof
This change should be fine since we haven't committed and upstream dtsi,
so there's no ABI to break yet.
Agree the cover letter should have been explicit in explaining.
So these are recently added bindings (sc7280 is not particularly new)?
If so mention in the commit msg that no users are affected because of this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Agreed.
The commit log should make clear that the ABI hasn't been cemented yet.
20241217140656.965235-4-quic_vikramsa@xxxxxxxxxxx <- is still pending
---
bod
