On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:15:55AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 05:53:53PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:59:04AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > Add the get_mbus_config() as the means for conveying the link frequency > > > towards the receiver drivers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/driver-api/media/tx-rx.rst | 4 ++++ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/tx-rx.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/tx-rx.rst > > > index dd09484df1d3..1430c330fd52 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/media/tx-rx.rst > > > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/tx-rx.rst > > > @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ Link frequency > > > The :ref:`V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ <v4l2-cid-link-freq>` control is used to tell the > > > receiver the frequency of the bus (i.e. it is not the same as the symbol rate). > > > > > > +On devices where the link frequency isn't configurable, the link_freq field of > > > +struct v4l2_mbus_config is recommended over controls for conveying the link > > > +frequency to the downstream driver in the pipeline. > > > > When read in its entirety, the paragraphs > > > > Link frequency > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > The :ref:`V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ <v4l2-cid-link-freq>` control is used to tell the > > receiver the frequency of the bus (i.e. it is not the same as the symbol rate). > > > > On devices where the link frequency isn't configurable, the link_freq field of > > struct v4l2_mbus_config is recommended over controls for conveying the link > > frequency. > > > > Sounds simpler without the last 7 words. > > > > A nit and just tastes maybe > > I used: > > On devices where the link frequency isn't configurable, using the ``link_freq`` > field of struct v4l2_mbus_config is recommended over controls. Is it a recommendation for the transmitter driver or the receiver driver ? If it's a recommendation for the transmitter driver, does that mean it should not implement V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ in that case ? How about the need to expose the link frequency to userspace when it's fixed ? I think the documentation needs further clarification to clearly explain what transmitters should do and what receivers should do. > > > > I like where this is going! > > > > Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart