UB9702 has the refclk freq register at a different offset than UB960, but the code uses the UB960's offset for both chips. Fix this. The refclk freq is only used for a debug print, so there's no functional change here. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: afe267f2d368 ("media: i2c: add DS90UB960 driver") --- drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c index ffe5f25f8647..b1e848678218 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c @@ -352,6 +352,8 @@ #define UB960_SR_I2C_RX_ID(n) (0xf8 + (n)) /* < UB960_FPD_RX_NPORTS */ +#define UB9702_SR_REFCLK_FREQ 0x3d + /* Indirect register blocks */ #define UB960_IND_TARGET_PAT_GEN 0x00 #define UB960_IND_TARGET_RX_ANA(n) (0x01 + (n)) @@ -3837,7 +3839,10 @@ static int ub960_enable_core_hw(struct ub960_data *priv) if (ret) goto err_pd_gpio; - ret = ub960_read(priv, UB960_XR_REFCLK_FREQ, &refclk_freq); + if (priv->hw_data->is_ub9702) + ret = ub960_read(priv, UB9702_SR_REFCLK_FREQ, &refclk_freq); + else + ret = ub960_read(priv, UB960_XR_REFCLK_FREQ, &refclk_freq); if (ret) goto err_pd_gpio; -- 2.43.0