Hi Hans, On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 2:14 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Jiasheng, > > On 21/11/2024 21:25, Jiasheng Jiang wrote: > > Add check for the return value of clk_enable() to gurantee the success. > > > > Fixes: 81a409bfd551 ("media: marvell-ccic: provide a clock for the sensor") > > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c > > index 9ec01228f907..47023e701e12 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c > > @@ -935,7 +935,9 @@ static int mclk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) > > ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(cam->dev); > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > - clk_enable(cam->clk[0]); > > + ret = clk_enable(cam->clk[0]); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > If clk_enable returns an error, doesn't this also require a call to pm_runtime_put() to > balance the pm_runtime_resume_and_get() call? Thanks. I will submit a v2 to add error handling. -Jiasheng > Regards, > > Hans > > > mcam_reg_write(cam, REG_CLKCTRL, (mclk_src << 29) | mclk_div); > > mcam_ctlr_power_up(cam); > > >