On 29/11/2024 13:46, barnabas.czeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2024-11-29 13:25, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 29/11/2024 11:44, barnabas.czeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The change does not describe how to reproduce the problem, which commit
base is tested, which platform is testes, there is no enough
information,
unfortunately.
I can reproduce the problem with megapixels-sensorprofile on msm8953 and
it can be reproduced with megapixels on msm8996.
The base is the last commit on next.
Can you verify if vfe_domain_on has run and if so whether or not
genpd_link is NULL when that function exists.
I have added some debug logs it seems pm_domain_on and pm_domain_off is
called twice on the same object.
[ 63.473360] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_on 19842ce8 link
42973800
[ 63.481524] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_on 19840080 link
4e413800
[ 63.481555] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_on 19842ce8 link
42973800
[ 63.481632] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_off 19840080 link
4e413800
[ 63.481641] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_off 19842ce8 link
42973800
[ 63.654004] qcom-camss 1b00020.camss: pm_domain_off 19842ce8 link 0
That's the question.
---
bod
Could you provide this output ?
index 80a62ba112950..b25b8f6b00be1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
@@ -595,6 +595,9 @@ void vfe_isr_reset_ack(struct vfe_device *vfe)
*/
void vfe_pm_domain_off(struct vfe_device *vfe)
{
+dev_info(camss->dev, "%s VFE %d genpd %pK genpd_link %pK\n",
+ __func__, vfe->id, vfe->genpd, vfe->genpd_link);
+
if (!vfe->genpd)
return;
@@ -609,7 +612,8 @@ void vfe_pm_domain_off(struct vfe_device *vfe)
int vfe_pm_domain_on(struct vfe_device *vfe)
{
struct camss *camss = vfe->camss;
-
+dev_info(camss->dev, "%s VFE %d genpd %pK genpd_link %pK\n",
+ __func__, vfe->id, vfe->genpd, vfe->genpd_link);
if (!vfe->genpd)
return 0;
---
bod
