As the media subsystem will experiment with a multi-committers model,
update the Maintainer's entry profile to the new rules, and add a file
documenting the process to become a committer and to maintain such
rights.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/driver-api/media/index.rst | 1 +
.../media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 8 +
.../driver-api/media/media-committer.rst | 278 ++++++++++++++++++
.../process/maintainer-pgp-guide.rst | 2 +
4 files changed, 289 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/media/media-committer.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/index.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/index.rst
index d5593182a3f9..d0c725fcbc67 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/media/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/index.rst
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Documentation/userspace-api/media/index.rst
:numbered:
maintainer-entry-profile
+ media-committer
v4l2-core
dtv-core
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
index 47f15fad7f9f..650803c30c41 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ as described at Documentation/process/index.rst and to the Kernel
development rules inside the Kernel documentation, including its code of
conduct.
+More details about media commiters' roles and responsibilities can be
+found here: Documentation/driver-api/media/media-committer.rst.
+
Media development tree
----------------------
@@ -195,6 +198,11 @@ shall be validated by using PGP sign, via the
With the pull request workflow, pull requests shall use a GPG-signed tag.
+With the committers' workflow, this is ensured at the time merge request
+rights will be granted to the gitlab instance used by media-committers.git
+tree, after receiving the e-mail documented at
+:ref:`media-committer-agreement`.
+
For more details about PGP sign, please read
Documentation/process/maintainer-pgp-guide.rst.
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/media-committer.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/media-committer.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1756a7af6353
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/media-committer.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+Media committers
+================
+
+What is a media committer?
+--------------------------
+
+A media committer is a developer who can push patches from other developers
+and their own patches to the
+`media-committers <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/media-committers>`_
+tree.
+
+It is a media committer's duty to ensure that their entries in the MAINTAINERS
+file are kept up-to-date, and that submitted patches for files for which
+they are listed as maintainers are timely reviewed on the mailing list,
+ideally not waiting in patchwork as ``New`` for more than one Kernel merge
+cycle, and, if accepted, applying them at the media committer's tree.
+
+These commit rights are granted with some expectation of responsibility:
+committers are people who care about the Linux Kernel as a whole and
+about the Linux media subsystem and want to help its development. It
+is also based on a trust relationship between the rest of the committers,
+maintainers and the Linux Media community.
+
+The Linux Media community, also called LinuxTV community, has its primary
+site at https://linuxtv.org.
+
+As such, a media committer is not just someone who is capable of creating
+code, but someone who has demonstrated their ability to collaborate
+with the team, get the most knowledgeable people to review code,
+contribute high-quality code, and follow through to fix issues (in code
+or tests).
+
+.. Note::
+
+ 1. If a patch introduces a regression, then it is the media committer's
+ responsibility to correct that as soon as possible. Typically the
+ patch is either reverted, or an additional patch is committed that
+ fixes the regression;
+ 2. if patches are fixing bugs against already released Kernels, including
+ the reverts above mentioned, the media committer shall add the needed
+ tags. Please see :ref:`Media development workflow` for more details.
+
+Becoming a media committer
+--------------------------
+
+The most important aspect of volunteering to be a committer is that you have
+demonstrated the ability to give good code reviews. So we are looking for
+whether or not we think you will be good at doing that.
+
+As such, potential committers must earn enough credibility and trust from the
+LinuxTV community. To do that, developers shall be familiar with the open
+source model and have been active in the Linux Kernel community for some time,
+and, in particular, in the media subsystem.
+
+So, in addition to actually making the code changes, you are basically
+demonstrating your:
+
+- commitment to the project;
+- ability to collaborate with the team and communicate well;
+- understand of how upstream and the LinuxTV community work
+ (policies, processes for testing, code review, ...)
+- reasonable knowledge about:
+
+ - the Kernel development process:
+ Documentation/process/index.rst
+
+ - the Media development profile:
+ Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
+
+- understanding of the projects' code base and coding style;
+- ability to provide feedback to the patch authors;
+- ability to judge when a patch might be ready for review and to submit;
+- ability to write good code (last but certainly not least).
+
+Developers that intend to become committers are encouraged to participate
+at the yearly Linux Media Summit, typically co-located with another Linux
+conference.
+
+If you are doing such tasks and have become a valued developer, an
+existing committer can nominate you to the media subsystem maintainers.
+
+The ultimate responsibility for accepting a nominated committer is up to
+the subsystem's maintainers. The committers must earn a trust relationship
+with all subsystem maintainers, as, by granting you commit rights, they will
+be delegating part of their maintenance tasks.
+
+Due to that, to become a committer or a core committer, a consensus between
+all subsystem maintainers is required, as they all need to trust a developer
+well enough to be delegated the responsibility to maintain part of the code
+and to properly review patches from third parties, in a timely manner and
+keeping the status of the reviewed code at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org
+updated.
+
+.. Note::
+
+ In order to preserve/protect the developers that could have their commit
+ rights granted, denied or removed as well as the subsystem maintainers who
+ have the task to accept or deny commit rights, all communication related to
+ nominating a committer, preserving commit rights or leaving such function
+ should happen in private as much as possible.
+
+.. _media-committer-agreement:
+
+Media committer's agreement
+---------------------------
+
+Once a nominated committer is accepted by all subsystem maintainers,
+they will ask if the developer is interested in the nomination and discuss
+what area(s) of the media subsystem the committer will be responsible for.
+
+Once the developer accepts being a committer, the new committer shall
+explicitly accept the Kernel development policies described under its
+Documentation/, and, in particular to the rules on this document, by writing
+an e-mail to media-committers@xxxxxxxxxxx, with a declaration of intent
+following the model below::
+
+ I, John Doe, would like to change my status to: Committer
+
+ I intend to actively develop the XYZ driver, send fixes to drivers
+ that I can test, optionally reviewing patches and merging trivial
+ fixes in other areas of the subsystem, ...
+
+ For the purpose of committing patches to the media-committer's tree,
+ I'll be using my user https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/users/<username>.
+
+Followed by a formal declaration of agreement with the Kernel development
+rules::
+
+ I hereby declare that I agree with the Kernel development rules described at:
+
+ https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/driver-api/media/media-committer.rst
+
+ and to the Linux Kernel development process rules.
+
+ I agree to the Code of Conduct as documented in:
+ https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/code-of-conduct.rst
+
+ I am aware that I can, at any point of time, retire. In that case, I will
+ send an e-mail to notify the subsystem maintainers for them to revoke my
+ commit rights.
+
+ I am aware that the Kernel development rules change over time.
+ By doing a new push to media-commiter tree, I understand that I agree
+ with the rules in effect at the time of the commit.
+
+Such e-mail shall be signed with a PGP key cross signed by other Kernel and
+media developers. As described at :ref:`media-developers-gpg`_, the PGP
+signature, together with the gitlab user security are fundamental components
+that ensure the authentity of the merge requests that will happen at the
+media-committer.git tree.
+
+In case the kernel development process changes, by merging new commits
+in the
+`media-committer tree <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/media-committers>`_,
+the media committer implicitly declares their agreement with the latest
+version of the documented process including the contents of this file.
+
+.. note::
+
+ 1. Changes to the kernel media development process should be announced in
+ the media-committers mailinglist with a reasonable review period. All
+ committers are automatically subscribed to that mailinglist;
+ 2. Due to the distributed nature of the Kernel development, it is
+ possible that kernel development process changes may end being
+ reviewed/merged at the linux-docs mailing list, specially for the
+ contents under Documentation/process and for trivial typo fixes.
+
+Core committers
+---------------
+
+As described in Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
+a committer may be granted with additional rights to also be able to
+change a core file and/or media subsystem's Kernel API. The extent of
+the core committer's grants will be detailed by the subsystem maintainers
+when they nominate a core committer.
+
+Existing committers may become core committers and vice versa. Such
+decisions will be taken in consensus between the subsystem maintainers.
+
+Media committers rules
+----------------------
+
+Media committers shall do their best efforts to avoid merged patches that
+would break any existing drivers. If it breaks, fixup or revert patches
+shall be merged as soon as possible, aiming to be merged at the same Kernel
+cycle the bug is reported.
+
+Media committers shall behave accordingly to the rights granted by
+the subsystem maintainers, specially with regards of the scope of changes
+they may apply directly at the media-committers tree. Such scope can
+change over time on a mutual agreement between media committers and
+maintainers.
+
+As described at :ref:`Media development workflow`, there are workflows.
+For the committers' workflow, the following rules apply:
+
+- Each merged patch shall pass CI tests;
+
+- Media committers shall request reviews from other committers and
+ developers where applicable, i.e. because those developers have more
+ knowledge about some areas that are changed by a patch;
+
+- There shall be no open issues or unresolved or conflicting feedback
+ from anyone. Clear them up first. Defer to subsystem maintainers as needed.
+
+Patches that do not fall under the committer's workflow criteria will follow
+the pull request workflow as described at :ref:`Media development workflow`.
+
+Only a subsystem maintainer can override such rules.
+
+All media committers shall ensure that patchwork will reflect the current
+status, e.g. patches shall be delegated to the media committer who is
+handling them and the patch status shall be updated according to these rules:
+
+- ``Under review``: Used if the patch requires a second opinion
+ or when it is part of a pull request;
+- ``Accepted``: Once a patch is merged in the multi-committer tree.
+- ``Superseded``: There is a newer version of the patch posted to the
+ mailing list.
+- ``Duplicated``: There was another patch doing the same thing from someone
+ else that was accepted.
+- ``Not Applicable``: Use for patch series that are not merged at media.git
+ tree (e.g. drm, dmabuf, upstream merge, etc.) but were cross-posted to the
+ linux-media mailing list.
+
+If the committer decides not to merge it, then reply by email to patch
+authors, explaining why it is not merged, and patchwork shall be updated
+accordingly with either:
+
+- ``Changes Requested``: if a new revision was requested;
+- ``Rejected``: if the proposed change won't be merged upstream.
+
+If a media committer decides to retire, it is the committer's duty to
+notify the subsystem maintainers about that decision.
+
+.. Note::
+
+ Patchwork supports a couple of clients to help semi-automating
+ status updates via its REST interface:
+
+ https://patchwork.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage/clients/
+
+Maintaining media committer status
+----------------------------------
+
+A community of committers working together to move the Linux Kernel
+forward is essential to creating successful projects that are rewarding
+to work on. If there are problems or disagreements within the community,
+they can usually be solved through healthy discussion and debate.
+
+In the unhappy event that a media committer continues to disregard good
+citizenship (or actively disrupts the project), we may need to revoke
+that person's status. In such cases, if someone suggests the revocation
+with a good reason, then after discussing this among the media committers,
+the final decision is taken by the subsystem maintainers. As the decision
+to become a media committer comes from a consensus between subsystem
+maintainers, a single subsystem maintainer not trusting the media committer
+anymore is enough to revoke committer's grants.
+
+If a committer is inactive for more than a couple of Kernel cycles,
+maintainers will try to reach you via e-mail. If not possible, they may
+revoke your committer grants and update MAINTAINERS file entries
+accordingly. If you wish to resume contributing later on, then contact
+the subsystem maintainers to ask if your rights can be restored.
+
+A previous committer that had their commit rights revoked can keep
+contributing to the subsystem via the pull request workflow as documented
+at the :ref:`Media development workflow`.
+
+References
+----------
+
+Much of this was inspired by/copied from the committer policies of:
+
+- `Chromium <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/contributing.md>`_;
+- `WebKit <https://webkit.org/commit-and-review-policy/>`_;
+- `Mozilla <https://www.mozilla.org/hacking/committer/>`_.
+
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-pgp-guide.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-pgp-guide.rst
index f5277993b195..795ef8d89271 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-pgp-guide.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-pgp-guide.rst
@@ -903,6 +903,8 @@ the new default in GnuPG v2). To set it, add (or modify) the
trust-model tofu+pgp
+.. _kernel_org_trust_repository:
+
Using the kernel.org web of trust repository
--------------------------------------------
--
2.47.0
