On 21/11/2024 00:37, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
On 11/21/24 01:27, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 20/11/2024 23:02, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
like "vdd-csiphy-0p9-supply" and "vdd-csiphy-1p2-supply"?
In theory, however I'd like to avoid adding endless strings of new names
into the driver code for each different power input.
I don't understand this argument, it's the same degree of endlessness as
the endlessness of new designed SoCs. Should it be stopped now or what's
the point here?
I mean to say, I don't want to backdoor a bunch of optional regulators
with odd names via this method.
Per our previous disucssions/agreements we will do this in a real PHY
instead of inline in CAMSS.
---
bod
