Em Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:38:37 +0200 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi Hans, > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 12:38:55PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Add myself as co-maintainer for the UVC driver. > > Thanks for volunteering to help. > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 91d0609db61b..1da403e89159 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -24063,6 +24063,7 @@ F: drivers/usb/host/uhci* > > > > USB VIDEO CLASS > > M: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > +M: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > L: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > S: Maintained > > W: http://www.ideasonboard.org/uvc/ > > I think we should update the git tree entry as well, as we're using > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/users/uvc/. As that's > temporary until we can merge patches directly in the multi-committers > tree, it may however not be worth it. What do you think ? The official tree is now at: git://linuxtv.org/media.git Such tree is not expected to be rebased, so IMO the best is to point to it. I just submitted a patch mass-updating the references to media_tree.git to it. Such patch has to be backported, as even stable versions should be pointing to an existing tree (and we may soon get rid of the media_tree.git and media_stage.git trees). Assuming that we have a smooth process, I don't expect that patches at the uvc merge tree to be there for a long time. Also, this is meant to be a short-lived tree with the migration to media-committers (which is a tree that can be rebased). So, IMO, it is not worth pointing to the uvc merge tree. Thanks, Mauro
