> This should've been [PATCH v2], because this *is* a version 2: even if you > have changed the title a bit, it's still "the same" patch ;-) Oh okay!! I didn’t know that one should have marked it as v2. My apologies for that! Thanks for being lenient this time, I really appreciate it. I’ll make sure this doesn’t happen again. > Next time, please version your patches correctly. Absolutely! > > Anyway, apart from this not being declared as v2, this time I'll let you > get my > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > ...because the patch is good, and because it's only the first time that I warn > you about this :-) > >Keep up the good work! Thanks!
