Hi Prabhakar, On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 04:32:22PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > While assigning the subdev device pointer, use the local `dev` pointer > which is already extracted from the `i2c_client` pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c > index bcbf3239d3ea..d344d3447a95 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c > @@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > ov5645->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | > V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS; > ov5645->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE; > - ov5645->sd.dev = &client->dev; > + ov5645->sd.dev = dev; > ov5645->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR; > > ret = media_entity_pads_init(&ov5645->sd.entity, 1, &ov5645->pad); > -- > 2.43.0 > > Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@xxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks & Regards, Tommaso
