The PLL checks are comparing 64 bit integers with 32 bit
ones, as reported by Coverity. Depending on the values of
the variables, this may underflow.
Fix it ensuring that both sides of the expression are u64.
Fixes: 852b50aeed15 ("media: On Semi AR0521 sensor driver")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
index fc27238dd4d3..24873149096c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c
@@ -255,10 +255,10 @@ static u32 calc_pll(struct ar0521_dev *sensor, u32 freq, u16 *pre_ptr, u16 *mult
continue; /* Minimum value */
if (new_mult > 254)
break; /* Maximum, larger pre won't work either */
- if (sensor->extclk_freq * (u64)new_mult < AR0521_PLL_MIN *
+ if (sensor->extclk_freq * (u64)new_mult < (u64)AR0521_PLL_MIN *
new_pre)
continue;
- if (sensor->extclk_freq * (u64)new_mult > AR0521_PLL_MAX *
+ if (sensor->extclk_freq * (u64)new_mult > (u64)AR0521_PLL_MAX *
new_pre)
break; /* Larger pre won't work either */
new_pll = div64_round_up(sensor->extclk_freq * (u64)new_mult,
--
2.47.0
