Hi Uros Thanks for the email! We have fixed it in the latest version Regards! On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 18:30, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:21 AM Patchwork Integration > <patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Dear Uros Bizjak: > > > > The unreliable Media-CI system has found some issues with your series. > > Check the report at: https://linux-media.pages.freedesktop.org/-/users/patchwork/-/jobs/64723788/artifacts/report.htm > > > > Please fix your series, and upload a new version. If you have a patchwork > > account, do not forget to mark the current series as Superseded. > > > > If you believe that the CI is wrong, kindly reply-all to this email. > > I don't think CI is correct in my case, the failure log says that I > should prefix my patch with "media:": > > WARNING: ./0001-dma-buf-Use-atomic64_inc_return-in-dma_buf_getfile.patch: > Missing 'media:' prefix in Subject > > But the patch is not specific to media, it is specific to dma-buf. > > Best regards, > Uros. -- Ricardo Ribalda
