Hi Mikhail
Thanks for the report
Your fixes tag:
Fixes: a6b5f200 ("V4L/DVB (13661): rj54n1cb0c: Add cropping, auto
white balance, restrict sizes, add platform data")
Is mentioning a patch that is part of stable:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=a6b5f2008a3d54b5f5350a01121b718dd6bfead7
As per https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
The stable tree prefers that in these situations you add a tag like:
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All the patches for the media subsystem should have the media: prefix.
The patch you are fixing does not have it because it was submitted
before the rule was in place.
Regards!
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 23:36, Михаил Лобанов <m.lobanov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I believe the bot flagged my patch incorrectly. Since the patch hasn’t been accepted upstream, it doesn’t make sense to include stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Additionally, I omitted "media" from the subject because the patch I am fixing does not have it in its title.
>
> Please let me know if further clarification is needed.
>
> Best regards,
> Mikhail Lobanov
>
> ----- Исходное сообщение -----
> От: "Patchwork Integration" <patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Кому: "Михаил Лобанов" <m.lobanov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Отправленные: Пятница, 4 Октябрь 2024 г 15:52:16
> Тема: re: [v2] V4L/DVB (13661): rj54n1cb0c: possible integer overflow fix
>
> Dear Mikhail Lobanov:
>
> The unreliable Media-CI system has found some issues with your series.
> Check the report at: https://linux-media.pages.freedesktop.org/-/users/patchwork/-/jobs/64664035/artifacts/report.htm
>
> Please fix your series, and upload a new version. If you have a patchwork
> account, do not forget to mark the current series as Superseded.
>
> If you believe that the CI is wrong, kindly reply-all to this email.
>
> Best regards!
--
Ricardo Ribalda
