On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 10:16 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:19:57AM -0500, Andy Walls wrote: > > Resending, since this didn't appear to make its way into in 2.6.36.2. > > That's because it's not in Linus's tree, right? I have to wait for that > to happen before I can add it to a stable tree. Greg, I wasn't aware of that constraint in the process, but it makes sense to me. Mauro, My understanding is that the patch has to be in one of your trees first, and then tested in linux-next for a reasonable length of time, before Linus will pull it into his tree. Could you please expedite handling of this patch for 2.6.37: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/376612/ so that the regression can be fixed in 2.6.36? Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
