From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@xxxxxxxxxxx> As we don't know the mode during probe(), it doesn't make sense to update the sensors' registers with assumptions. Avoid the communication in this case. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes since v2: - new --- drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c index ece4d66001f5..9610e9fd2059 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c @@ -769,6 +769,10 @@ static int imx290_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl) if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(imx290->dev)) return 0; + /* V4L2 controls values will be applied only when mode is known */ + if (imx290->current_mode == &imx290_mode_off) + return 0; + state = v4l2_subdev_get_locked_active_state(&imx290->sd); format = v4l2_subdev_state_get_format(state, 0); -- 2.46.0