The new CEC_MSG_FL_REPLY_VENDOR_ID flag only makes sense in combination
with CEC_MSG_VENDOR_COMMAND_WITH_ID. So rather than reporting an error
if that flag is set with another command, just clear the flag instead.
Only keep the message length check, since otherwise the flag would not
make sense.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c
index c81b1ed7c08a..c7d36010c890 100644
--- a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c
@@ -781,7 +781,8 @@ int cec_transmit_msg_fh(struct cec_adapter *adap, struct cec_msg *msg,
{
struct cec_data *data;
bool is_raw = msg_is_raw(msg);
- bool reply_vendor_id = msg->flags & CEC_MSG_FL_REPLY_VENDOR_ID;
+ bool reply_vendor_id = (msg->flags & CEC_MSG_FL_REPLY_VENDOR_ID) &&
+ msg->len > 1 && msg->msg[1] == CEC_MSG_VENDOR_COMMAND_WITH_ID;
int err;
if (adap->devnode.unregistered)
@@ -797,7 +798,7 @@ int cec_transmit_msg_fh(struct cec_adapter *adap, struct cec_msg *msg,
msg->tx_error_cnt = 0;
msg->sequence = 0;
msg->flags &= CEC_MSG_FL_REPLY_TO_FOLLOWERS | CEC_MSG_FL_RAW |
- CEC_MSG_FL_REPLY_VENDOR_ID;
+ (reply_vendor_id ? CEC_MSG_FL_REPLY_VENDOR_ID : 0);
if ((reply_vendor_id || msg->reply) && msg->timeout == 0) {
/* Make sure the timeout isn't 0. */
@@ -812,9 +813,9 @@ int cec_transmit_msg_fh(struct cec_adapter *adap, struct cec_msg *msg,
dprintk(1, "%s: invalid length %d\n", __func__, msg->len);
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (reply_vendor_id &&
- (msg->len < 6 || msg->msg[1] != CEC_MSG_VENDOR_COMMAND_WITH_ID)) {
- dprintk(1, "%s: message too short or not <Vendor Command With ID>\n", __func__);
+ if (reply_vendor_id && msg->len < 6) {
+ dprintk(1, "%s: <Vendor Command With ID> message too short\n",
+ __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.43.0
