There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named
'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing
patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the
code self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c
index c1108df72dd5..5c823d3f9cc0 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static irqreturn_t isi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
#define WAIT_ISI_DISABLE 0
static int atmel_isi_wait_status(struct atmel_isi *isi, int wait_reset)
{
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
/*
* The reset or disable will only succeed if we have a
* pixel clock from the camera.
@@ -257,9 +257,9 @@ static int atmel_isi_wait_status(struct atmel_isi *isi, int wait_reset)
isi_writel(isi, ISI_CTRL, ISI_CTRL_DIS);
}
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&isi->complete,
- msecs_to_jiffies(500));
- if (timeout == 0)
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&isi->complete,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(500));
+ if (time_left == 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
return 0;
--
2.43.0
