On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:44 AM Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25/06/2024 17:57, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > On 24.06.2024 5:03 PM, george chan wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bryan O'Donoghue > >> <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote: > >>>> - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all. > >>> > >>> Have you not tested this updated series ? > >>> > >>> --- > >>> bod > >> > >> Do you wanna add my tested-by too? It just feels weird to add my > >> tested-by that way. > > > > "RFT" means "I didn't actually test this" or "please provide more testing", > > not "there have not been tested-by's from others" > > > > Konrad > > Exactly, RFT says to me "someone else needs to add testing here". > gotcha. > In your next drop with the changes and RBs please drop RFT - unless you > want someone else to test it for you. > If the test result on sm7125 is convincing then I have no problem. > I don't think that's required right now since the set seems > straight-forward enough and TBH the bit of 7180 hardware I have sits in > a box unopened and will likely stay that way for the next few months at > least. > > I think your example video is proof enough the thing works ;) Nice to hear. > > --- > bod
