Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/06/2024 16:41, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 10:52:33AM +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:
> >> Le ven. 12 janv. 2024 à 08:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> >>> On 10/01/2024 15:14, Julien Stephan wrote:
>
> Eeeh? January?
>
> ...
>
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> + seninf: seninf@15040000 {
> >>>
> >>> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
> >>> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
> >>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
> >
> > The seninf is (mostly) a set of MIPI CSI-2 receivers. Would you prefer
> > 'csi', 'mipi-csi', 'csi-2' or any other name ?
>
> csi@ works for me
>
> > There's also the camsv IP in the same series that needs a generic name.
> > I really don't know what to propose for it. Could you recommend
> > something that would make you happy ?
>
> Sorry,that's almost half year old thread. Not present in my inbox.
I remember someone presenting a talk titled "Beginner Linux kernel
maintainer's toolbox" in Prague last year. The talk mentioned a tool
call b4. I highly recommend it ;-)
> > On a side note, that document lacks appropriate generic names for lots
> > of building blocks found in recent SoCs, it would be nice to get it
> > updated. You will eventually get better quality DT patches then :-)
>
> The list grew recently, so just add something there. But it is okay if
> some name is not really generic, it's just recommendation.
OK, then I think we can go for 'csi' for seninf, and keep 'camsv'.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
