The privacy status is maintained by privacy_ctrl, on which all
of the privacy status changes will go through, so there is no
point in maintaining one more element any more.
Reported-by: Hao Yao <hao.yao@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jason Chen <jason.z.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/pci/intel/ivsc/mei_csi.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ivsc/mei_csi.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ivsc/mei_csi.c
index d6ba0d9efca1..1d1b9181a50a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ivsc/mei_csi.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ivsc/mei_csi.c
@@ -138,9 +138,6 @@ struct mei_csi {
u32 nr_of_lanes;
/* frequency of the CSI-2 link */
u64 link_freq;
-
- /* privacy status */
- enum ivsc_privacy_status status;
};
static const struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt mei_csi_format_mbus_default = {
@@ -271,10 +268,8 @@ static void mei_csi_rx(struct mei_cl_device *cldev)
switch (notif.cmd_id) {
case CSI_PRIVACY_NOTIF:
- if (notif.cont.cont < CSI_PRIVACY_MAX) {
- csi->status = notif.cont.cont;
- v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(csi->privacy_ctrl, csi->status);
- }
+ if (notif.cont.cont < CSI_PRIVACY_MAX)
+ v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(csi->privacy_ctrl, notif.cont.cont);
break;
case CSI_SET_OWNER:
case CSI_SET_CONF:
--
2.34.1
