On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > The MAX96712 and MAX96724 are almost identical and can be supported by > the same driver, add a compatible for MAX96724. What does "almost identical" mean? I don't see another patch here adding the driver support, which makes me wonder if this was intended to be a fallback to the existing device... Ohh wait, the other patch is here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240527133410.1690169-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Put it in a series next time (and mention what actually is different in your commit message). Thanks, Conor. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max96712.yaml | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max96712.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max96712.yaml > index 6c72e77b927c..26f85151afbd 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max96712.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/maxim,max96712.yaml > @@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ description: | > > properties: > compatible: > - const: maxim,max96712 > + items: > + - enum: > + - maxim,max96712 > + - maxim,max96724 > > reg: > description: I2C device address > -- > 2.45.1 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
