Hi Sakari,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 07:13:06AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:09:35AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:11:26PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi Tommaso,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > > Into alvium cameras REG_BCRM_GAIN_RW control the analog gain.
> > > > Let's use the right V4L2_CID_ANALOGUE_GAIN ctrl.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c | 6 +++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c
> > > > index 30ef9b905211..56d64f27df72 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c
> > > > @@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ static int alvium_g_volatile_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> > > > int val;
> > > >
> > > > switch (ctrl->id) {
> > > > - case V4L2_CID_GAIN:
> > > > + case V4L2_CID_ANALOGUE_GAIN:
> > > > val = alvium_get_gain(alvium);
> > > > if (val < 0)
> > > > return val;
> > > > @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ static int alvium_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> > > > return 0;
> > > >
> > > > switch (ctrl->id) {
> > > > - case V4L2_CID_GAIN:
> > > > + case V4L2_CID_ANALOGUE_GAIN:
> > > > ret = alvium_set_ctrl_gain(alvium, ctrl->val);
> > > > break;
> > > > case V4L2_CID_AUTOGAIN:
> > > > @@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@ static int alvium_ctrl_init(struct alvium_dev *alvium)
> > > >
> > > > if (alvium->avail_ft.gain) {
> > > > ctrls->gain = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops,
> > > > - V4L2_CID_GAIN,
> > > > + V4L2_CID_ANALOGUE_GAIN,
> > > > alvium->min_gain,
> > > > alvium->max_gain,
> > > > alvium->inc_gain,
> > >
> > > This looks like a bugfix. Shouldn't it be cc'd to stable as well? A Fixes:
> > > tag would be nice, too.
> >
> > Fully agree.
> > Plan is to add in v2 Fixes: 0a7af872915e ("media: i2c: Add support for alvium camera")
> > like you suggest and stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in CC.
>
> Just make sure git send-email won't actually cc the patch to the stable
> e-mail address. Cc: tag is enough. The git config option is
> sendemail.suppresscc.
Sorry, just to clarify.
You are suggesting just to add sendemail.suppresscc. option right?
No cc stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks & Regards,
Tommaso
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
