Re: [PATCH] [RFC] dma-buf: fix race condition between poll and close

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.04.24 um 12:19 schrieb Dmitry Antipov:
On 4/24/24 10:09, Christian König wrote:

To repeat what I already said on the other thread: Calling dma_buf_poll() while fput() is in progress is illegal in the first place.

So there is nothing to fix in dma_buf_poll(), but rather to figure out who is incorrectly calling fput().

Hm. OTOH it's legal if userspace app calls close([fd]) in one thread when another thread sleeps in (e)poll({..., [fd], ...}) (IIUC this is close to what the syzbot reproducer actually does). What behavior should be considered as valid in this
(yes, really weird) scenario?

That scenario is actually not weird at all, but just perfectly normal.

As far as I read up on it the EPOLL_FD implementation grabs a reference to the underlying file of added file descriptors.

So you can actually close the added file descriptor directly after the operation completes, that is perfectly valid behavior.

It's just that somehow the reference which is necessary to call dma_buf_poll() is dropped to early.

I don't fully understand how that happens either, it could be that there is some bug in the EPOLL_FD code. Maybe it's a race when the EPOLL file descriptor is closed or something like that.

Regards,
Christian.


Dmitry






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux