On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:03:47AM -0600, git@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > There are a number of variants of the imx258 modules that can not > be differentiated at runtime, so add compatible strings for the > PDAF variant. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Luis Garcia <git@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml > index bee61a443b23..c978abc0cdb3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml > @@ -13,11 +13,16 @@ description: |- > IMX258 is a diagonal 5.867mm (Type 1/3.06) 13 Mega-pixel CMOS active pixel > type stacked image sensor with a square pixel array of size 4208 x 3120. It > is programmable through I2C interface. Image data is sent through MIPI > - CSI-2. > + CSI-2. The sensor exists in two different models, a standard variant > + (IMX258) and a variant with phase detection autofocus (IMX258-PDAF). > + The camera module does not expose the model through registers, so the > + exact model needs to be specified. > > properties: > compatible: > - const: sony,imx258 > + enum: > + - sony,imx258 > + - sony,imx258-pdaf Does the pdaf variant support all of the features/is it register compatible with the regular variant? If it is, the regular variant should be a fallback compatible. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
