At the moment we do:
routing.routes = (__u64)&routes;
On 32-bit platforms the 32-bit address will be sign-extended, possibly
resulting setting the address to, e.g., 0xff000000 -> 0xffffffffff000000.
Fix this by first converting the address to uintptr_t.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp | 4 ++--
utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp
index 2cf97909..82615c17 100644
--- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp
+++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ void testNode(struct node &node, struct node &node_m2m_cap, struct node &expbuf_
which <= V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE; which++) {
sd_routing[which].which = which;
- sd_routing[which].routes = (__u64)sd_routes[which];
+ sd_routing[which].routes = (__u64)(uintptr_t)sd_routes[which];
sd_routing[which].num_routes = NUM_ROUTES_MAX;
ret = doioctl(&node, VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING, &sd_routing[which]);
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ void testNode(struct node &node, struct node &node_m2m_cap, struct node &expbuf_
routes = sd_routes[which];
} else {
dummy_routing.num_routes = 1;
- dummy_routing.routes = (__u64)&dummy_routes;
+ dummy_routing.routes = (__u64)(uintptr_t)&dummy_routes;
dummy_routes[0].source_pad = pad;
dummy_routes[0].source_stream = 0;
dummy_routes[0].sink_pad = pad;
diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp
index ebca1b94..fe7a9e1d 100644
--- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp
+++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ int testSubDevRouting(struct node *node, unsigned which)
int ret;
routing.which = which;
- routing.routes = (__u64)&routes;
+ routing.routes = (__u64)(uintptr_t)&routes;
routing.num_routes = 0;
memset(routing.reserved, 0xff, sizeof(routing.reserved));
--
2.34.1
