On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:11:47PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: >Well, here's what I sent along on Friday: > >https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/321592/ > >Gives us support for using the full 32-bit codes right now w/o having >to change any tables yet, but does require a modparam to skip the >checksum checks, unless its an apple remote which we already know the >vendor bytes for. I do think I'm ultimately leaning towards just doing >the full 32 bits for all nec extended though -- optionally, we might >include a modparam to *enable* the checksum check for those that want >strict compliance (but I'd still say use the full 32 bits). The only >issue I see with going to the full 32 right now is that we have all >these nec tables with only 24 bits, and we don't know ... oh, wait, >no, nevermind... We *do* know the missing 8 bits, since they have to >fulfill the checksum check for command ^ not_command. So yeah, I'd say >32-bit scancodes for all nec extended, don't enforce the checksum by >default with a module option (or sysfs knob) to enable checksum >compliance. 32 bit scancodes for *all* NEC, not only NEC extended. The "strict" check will still be provided, just that it's done as part of the keytable lookup. -- David Härdeman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
