Hi Ricardo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 04:49:31PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Struct uvc_frame and uvc_format are packaged together on
> streaming->formats on a sigle allocation.
s/sigle/single/
>
> This is working fine because both structures have a field with a
> pointer, but it will stop working when the sizeof() of any of those
> structs is not a muliple of the sizeof(void*).
>
> Make that aligment contract explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is better than 3 allocations, and do not have any performance
> penalty.
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> index 9a596c8d894a..03e8a543c8e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ struct uvc_frame {
> u8 bFrameIntervalType;
> u32 dwDefaultFrameInterval;
> u32 *dwFrameInterval;
> -};
> +} __aligned(sizeof(void *)); /* uvc_frame is packed on streaming->formats. */
Don't we need u32 alignment here, not void * alignment, given that
uvc_frame is followed by an array of u32 ?
>
> struct uvc_format {
> u8 type;
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct uvc_format {
>
> unsigned int nframes;
> struct uvc_frame *frame;
> -};
> +} __aligned(sizeof(void *)); /* uvc_format is packed on streaming->formats. */
Same here, technically we need to ensure that the following uvc_frame
will be aligned. void * alignment will give us that now, but that's not
the actual constraint.
Wouldn't it be better to handle the alignment constraints explicitly
when allocating the memory ? It's not that uvc_frame and uvc_format have
intrinsic alignment constraints, the constraints are only needed because
of the way memory is allocated.
>
> struct uvc_streaming_header {
> u8 bNumFormats;
>
> ---
> base-commit: 58390c8ce1bddb6c623f62e7ed36383e7fa5c02f
> change-id: 20230501-uvc-align-6ff202b68dab
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
