Hi Yunke,
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:19 +0900, Yunke Cao wrote:
> + {
> + .id = V4L2_CID_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO,
> + .entity = UVC_GUID_UVC_CAMERA,
> + .selector = UVC_CT_REGION_OF_INTEREST_CONTROL,
> + .data_size = 16,
> + .offset = 64,
> + .v4l2_type = V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_BITMASK,
> + .data_type = UVC_CTRL_DATA_TYPE_BITMASK,
> + .name = "Region Of Interest Auto Controls",
> + },
> };
>
I am just wondering would it makes sense to use individual boolean V4L2
controls for these?
It would work with the existing V4L2 applications without knowing what
this bitmask is.
>
> +/* V4L2 driver-specific controls */
> +#define V4L2_CID_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_RECT (V4L2_CID_CAMERA_UVC_BASE + 1)
> +#define V4L2_CID_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO (V4L2_CID_CAMERA_UVC_BASE + 2)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_EXPOSURE (1 << 0)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_IRIS (1 << 1)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_WHITE_BALANCE (1 << 2)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_FOCUS (1 << 3)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_FACE_DETECT (1 << 4)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_DETECT_AND_TRACK (1 << 5)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_IMAGE_STABILIZATION (1 << 6)
> +#define V4L2_UVC_REGION_OF_INTEREST_AUTO_HIGHER_QUALITY (1 << 7)
> +
Regards,
Gergo
