Re: [PATCH 4/5] media: imx335: Fix active area height discrepency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kieran,

On 06/03/24 10:35 pm, Kieran Bingham wrote:
Quoting Umang Jain (2024-03-06 08:10:37)
The imx335 reports a recommended pixel area of - 2592x1944.
The driver supported mode however limits it to height=1940.
Hrm, I think I would convert widths and sizes to decimal as a patch
before this patch so the effect is clearer in this diff.

Fix the height discrepency by correctly the value of height
(with updates to vblank and mode registers).

Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c | 18 +++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
index 6ea09933e47b..c00e0c2be3f3 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
@@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ static const int imx335_tpg_val[] = {
  };
/* Sensor mode registers */
-static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1940_regs[] = {
+static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1944_regs[] = {
         {IMX335_REG_MODE_SELECT, 0x01},
         {IMX335_REG_MASTER_MODE, 0x00},
-       {IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x04},
-       {IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x0180},
+       {IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x00},
What's the distinction of the winmode here. What is 0x04 vs 0x00?

Is this something that could be a defined value? Or is that not worth
the effort?

It can be split out as a define in later parts if we introduce more modes. currently this change fixes the sensor to be in 'all-pixel scan mode' hence you see the change in value of WINMODE.

+       {IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x30},
HTRIMMING_START has moved a lot more than I would expect there.
Is there a visual impact of any concern here?

Value as per mentioned in the datasheet

         {IMX335_REG_HNUM, 0x0a20},
-       {IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0794},
+       {IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0798},
This bit looks expected ;-)

         {IMX335_REG_VCROP_POS, 0x00b0},
         {IMX335_REG_VCROP_SIZE, 0x0f58},
0x0f58 = 3928. Does that correspond to anything on the pixel array size?
We're modifying the vertical size, so I'm curious if the 'vcrop' is or
should be impacted?

Probably I have not named this correctly, as VCROP_

This register (0x3076) is denotes the size of cropping rectangle
Named as 'AREA3_WIDTH_1' with explaination 'cropping size designation (Vertical direction)'

The value 0x0f58 is as per mentioned in the datasheet. I don't find any relation except 3928 is twice the IMX335_NATIVE_HEIGHT

         {IMX335_REG_OPB_SIZE_V, 0x00},
@@ -403,14 +403,14 @@ static const u32 imx335_mbus_codes[] = {
  /* Supported sensor mode configurations */
  static const struct imx335_mode supported_mode = {
         .width = 2592,
-       .height = 1940,
+       .height = 1944,
         .hblank = 342,
-       .vblank = 2560,
-       .vblank_min = 2560,
+       .vblank = 2556,
+       .vblank_min = 2556,
         .vblank_max = 133060,
         .reg_list = {
-               .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1940_regs),
-               .regs = mode_2592x1940_regs,
+               .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1944_regs),
+               .regs = mode_2592x1944_regs,
         },
  };
--
2.43.0






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux