On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 06:48:25PM +0100, Julien Panis wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On 2/26/24 18:25, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:01:37PM +0100, Julien Panis wrote:
> > > This patch adds XDP (eXpress Data Path) support to TI AM65 CPSW
> > > Ethernet driver. The following features are implemented:
> > > - NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC (XDP_PASS, XDP_TX, XDP_DROP, XDP_ABORTED)
> > > - NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT (XDP_REDIRECT)
> > > - NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT (ndo_xdp_xmit callback)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ...
> >
> > > @@ -440,6 +476,27 @@ static void am65_cpsw_nuss_tx_cleanup(void *data, dma_addr_t desc_dma)
> > > dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> > > }
> > > +static struct sk_buff *am65_cpsw_alloc_skb(struct net_device *ndev, unsigned int len)
> > > +{
> > > + struct page *page;
> > > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > nit: please arrange local variables in reverse xmas tree order,
> > from longest line to shortest in new code.
> >
> > This tool can be useful: https://github.com/ecree-solarflare/xmastree
>
> You mean, for the new functions introduced in this patch only ?
It's a bit loose. But generally the idea would be to move towards this
practice. So for new functions: yes. And when modifying old ones old ones:
if possible.
> > > +
> > > + page = dev_alloc_pages(0);
> > nit: Maybe dev_alloc_page() is appropriate here?
>
> Absolutely.
>
> >
> > > + if (unlikely(!page))
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > + len += AM65_CPSW_HEADROOM;
> > > +
> > > + skb = build_skb(page_address(page), len);
> > > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > Does page need to be freed here?
>
> Of course it does ! This will be fixed in the next version.
Thanks!
>
> >
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > + skb_reserve(skb, AM65_CPSW_HEADROOM + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> > > + skb->dev = ndev;
> > > +
> > > + return skb;
> > > +}
> > ...
>
